Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU vs Universidade Belas Artes vs Faculdade Santa Marcelina - FASM vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa
Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High quality faculty and excellent teaching
- +Convenient location and safety
- +Scholarship and alumni discount programs
- +Engaging and effective teaching
- +Supportive learning environment
- +Strong academic reputation and career prospects
- +World-class fashion education and facilities
- +Practical application of ideas
- +Recognition and international level of teaching
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +High didactic standards and educational quality
- +Blend of traditional and problem-based learning
- +Sufficient anatomy lab resources
- -Lack of practical learning opportunities and rescheduled experiences.
- -Insufficient or outdated facilities impacting the educational experience.
- -Nepotism and lack of fairness in opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -A perceived lack of value or outdated curriculum is a recurring concern.
This institution garners solid scores in several key aspects. Its location is a standout strength, while facilities and professors also receive favorable ratings. Student life and value for money are areas with room for improvement. Accommodation and internationality are the weakest points, suggesting opportunities for enhancement in these domains.
This institution's strongest asset is its prime location, earning a perfect score. Conversely, facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received the lowest possible rating, indicating significant areas requiring improvement.
This university presents a uniform performance across all evaluated aspects, with no discernible strengths or weaknesses. All categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received identical ratings. This suggests a consistent, albeit undeveloped, offering in every surveyed area.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution shines brightly in several key areas. Professors are rated a perfect 5, alongside its location and overall value for money, indicating exceptional quality and appeal. Student life also garners a strong score of 4. However, the university's accommodation is a significant area for improvement, receiving a low rating of 1. Facilities and internationality are moderately rated at 3.
University feedback is mixed, with a ~25% of reviews expressing dissatisfaction. Positive feedback highlights respected faculty and good facilities, while negative comments focus on a lack of rescheduled lab classes and field trips.
The single review is entirely negative, rating the university 1/5. It highlights frustration and nepotism as key issues, suggesting a lack of meritocracy.
The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 stars. This feedback highlights the college's excellent facilities and international-level fashion education, strongly recommending it. No negative feedback was provided.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university is well regarded with ~100% positive feedback, praised for its didactic standards, educational quality, and sufficient anatomy labs. However, ~26% of feedback notes deficient classroom infrastructure and outdated furniture.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
