University of Koblenz and Landau vs Northwestern University vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs Oxademy Business School - OBS vs Bahrain Polytechnic

Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Koblenz and Landau: wins 0/6 categories
Northwestern University: wins 4/6 categories
St. Mary's University, San Antonio: wins 0/6 categories
Oxademy Business School - OBS: wins 0/6 categories
Bahrain Polytechnic: wins 0/6 categories
American University of Bahrain: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Evanston, Illinois, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: Biochemistry
San Antonio, Texas, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration and International Relations
Oxford, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.45
Win
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.36
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.67
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
4.29
2.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.44
5.00
Not rated
1.00
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.27
Win
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Vibrant arts and drama programs
  • +Excellent academic challenge and opportunities
  • +Caring and dedicated staff and accessible professors
  • +Extensive student support
  • +Strong marketing and business programmes

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and practical teaching
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Strong career focus and industry connections
  • +Inspiring academic environment and dedicated faculty
  • +High-quality education and memorable experience
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and communication problems plague the institution.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized and outdated program content
  • -Poor administrative and management practices
  • -Inadequate facilities and resources
  • -Excessive administrative tasks and ineffective management are frustrating.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Limited access to resources and support hinders learning.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Across key metrics, this university demonstrates a generally positive reception from students. Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a particular strength in instructional quality. The university also scores well in Facilities and Value. Location and Student Life also present strong, favorable ratings. Accommodations and Internationality show slightly lower, though still solid, performance, representing areas for potential focus.

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a mixed performance across various aspects. Its strongest areas are **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a respectable rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** emerge as significant weaknesses, scoring the lowest. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** fall in the lower tier, suggesting room for improvement in these domains as well.

This institution excels significantly in academic and global aspects, receiving perfect scores for its professors, internationality, and value. Conversely, critical areas such as facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are rated as non-existent, suggesting these are either absent or completely unassessed. The university's strengths lie clearly in its educational quality and global appeal.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Approximately 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academics and dedicated faculty. Students appreciate the vibrant arts programs and the diverse opportunities offered by the quarter system. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

With only one review available, it is overwhelmingly negative (100%). The single review expresses disappointment with the disorganization of the Communications and Networks Engineering degree program.

This university has a perfect 5/5 rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students praise the inspiring academic environment, supportive faculty, and overall memorable experience.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
31%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close