American Graduate School in Paris vs Brest State University vs Acadia University vs Walailak University International College of Dentistry vs Institute of Management and Technology - IMT

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: American University of Bahrain (5.00)
American Graduate School in Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Brest State University: wins 0/7 categories
Acadia University: wins 0/7 categories
Walailak University International College of Dentistry: wins 0/7 categories
Institute of Management and Technology - IMT : wins 4/7 categories
Bahrain Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
American University of Bahrain: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Wolfville, Canada
4.20
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Best programme: MBA
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
3.95
Not rated
4.17
Win
2.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
Not rated
3.61
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.10
Not rated
4.33
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
4.10
Not rated
3.83
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
3.62
Not rated
4.17
Win
2.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.50
1.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and intimate learning environments
  • +Opportunities for personal and intellectual growth
  • +Beautiful and serene campus setting

Nothing to show

  • +Strong focus on engineering and technology
  • +Up-to-date teaching and challenging practicals
  • +Qualified and patient lecturers
  • +Engaging and practical teaching
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Strong career focus and industry connections
  • +Inspiring academic environment and dedicated faculty
  • +High-quality education and memorable experience
Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent problems.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support cause frustration.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date with industry standards.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of clear communication.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Disorganized and outdated program content
  • -Poor administrative and management practices
  • -Inadequate facilities and resources
  • -Excessive administrative tasks and ineffective management are frustrating.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Limited access to resources and support hinders learning.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an impressive overall score of 4.0, the institution excels in **Internationality** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 4.1. **Professors** also garnered a strong 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a score of 3. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** fall within a solid mid-range, indicating generally positive but less exceptional performance in these categories.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and strong performances in **Value** (4.5) and **Accomodation** and **Professors** (both 4.33). Facilities and Student Life also score well at 4.17. The area requiring the most attention appears to be **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.83.

This institution presents a mixed performance across various aspects. Its strongest areas are **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a respectable rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** emerge as significant weaknesses, scoring the lowest. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** fall in the lower tier, suggesting room for improvement in these domains as well.

This institution excels significantly in academic and global aspects, receiving perfect scores for its professors, internationality, and value. Conversely, critical areas such as facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are rated as non-existent, suggesting these are either absent or completely unassessed. The university's strengths lie clearly in its educational quality and global appeal.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With 19 positive reviews out of 20 (95%), students praise supportive professors, personal growth, and the serene campus environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students commend the institution's technology focus, excellent engineering and technology performance, updated teaching, and challenging practicals.

With only one review available, it is overwhelmingly negative (100%). The single review expresses disappointment with the disorganization of the Communications and Networks Engineering degree program.

This university has a perfect 5/5 rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students praise the inspiring academic environment, supportive faculty, and overall memorable experience.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
20%
0%
33%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
75%
0%
33%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
5%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Ideal environment

I'm finding my time at Arcadia quite enjoyable overall. The professors have been incredibly supportive, taking the effort to personally connect with each student. The campus's serene beauty adds to the experience, creating an ideal environment for concentrated studying

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close