City University of Hong Kong - CityU vs Monmouth University vs University of Ontario Institute of Technology - UOIT vs Rostov State University of Economics vs Excelsior University

Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International University Semen Indonesia (5.00)
City University of Hong Kong - CityU: wins 6/7 categories
Monmouth University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Ontario Institute of Technology - UOIT: wins 1/7 categories
Rostov State University of Economics: wins 0/7 categories
Excelsior University: wins 0/7 categories
International University Semen Indonesia: wins 0/7 categories
Eschosys Bhifmet: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bioengineering
Monmouth County, New Jersey, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Forensic Psychology
Albany, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Yaounde, Cameroon
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
4.38
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.85
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.20
Win
Not rated
4.19
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.80
Win
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.05
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.80
Win
Not rated
3.74
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong program depth and regional focus
  • +Experienced and helpful faculty mentorship
  • +Practical skills and real-world experience opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable professors
  • +Welcoming and friendly university environment
  • +Abundant resources and helpful support for students

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Kind and cooperative lecturers
  • +Advantageous downtown location with nearby campuses and transport accommodation
  • +Fun classes and subjects

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and feedback is a consistent problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and loss of credits.
  • -Facilities are outdated and in poor condition.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common source of dissatisfaction.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With outstanding marks in **Professors, Location, and Value (all 5/5)**, this institution excels in key areas. Student life and accommodation also receive very high scores (4.8/5). Facilities are rated well at 4/5, while Internationality stands out as the relatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.2/5.

Nothing to show

This university garners excellent marks for its **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.38. It also performs well in **Internationality** (4.19) and **Professors** (4.14). Areas with room for improvement include **Student Life** (3.75) and **Accomodation** (3.74), which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed aspects. **Location** (3.85) and **Value** (4.05) fall within a moderate range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance, with all surveyed categories receiving a solid 4 out of 5. There are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated equally well. This suggests a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the university's strong programs, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities like internships and exchange programs.

Nothing to show

Most (~86%) reviews are positive, highlighting friendly environments and helpful professors. A small percentage (~5%) of feedback mentions issues with transfer credits. The average rating is 4.14/5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight kind lecturers, advantageous downtown location, and convenient campus/transportation accommodation. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
38%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
50%
0%
48%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Felt like I was trapped

I was a transfer from university of Toronto and when I tell you it genuinely feels like the program coordinators got their creditions from a homeless man down the street. I was in the computer science program at uoft transferred to the same here and the absolute incompetent morons at the transfer credit office basically disregarded over 12-13 credits I righfully earned as general credits instead of the correct course equivalence at the school. For example eesa courses ( environmental science) at uoft transferred as LIBERAL STUDIES CREDIT. Despite the otu equivalent course having the same syllabus as the eesa course the Program heads clearly made it a competition to display their blatant stupidity by disregarding this and continuing to assess these credits falsely. This school will trap you doing bulls*it courses and HOW ARE YOU CALLED A TECH UNIVERSITY WHEN YOU PROVIDE 0 COMPUTER SCIENCE COURSES OVER THE SUMMER AND YOUR COURSES ARE ALWAYS FULL

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close