Colegio Universitario Hotel Escuela de Los Andes Venezolanos - UNATUR vs Krannert School of Management vs Joaquim Chissano University - UJC vs Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM vs Universidade São Tomás

Side-by-side comparison from 8 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Colegio Universitario Hotel Escuela de Los Andes Venezolanos - UNATUR: wins 0/6 categories
Krannert School of Management: wins 0/6 categories
Joaquim Chissano University - UJC: wins 0/6 categories
Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM: wins 4/6 categories
Universidade São Tomás: wins 2/6 categories
University of Eastern Philippines - UEP: wins 0/6 categories
Polytechnic University Maputo - apolitécnica: wins 0/6 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.20
Win
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Win
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.40
Win
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Hands-on learning and practical experience
  • +Motivating teachers and pursuit of excellence
  • +Specialization options and extracurricular events

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and qualified professors
  • +Free tuition and accessible entry
  • +Good reputation and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum content is a significant drawback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Insufficient resources and support for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a rating of zero for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses were identified in the provided data. Therefore, no specific areas stand out as particularly high or low performing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were achieved in **Value** (4.6) and **Professors** and **Internationality** (both 4.2), indicating significant strengths in these areas. Conversely, the university received its lowest scores for **Accomodation** (3), followed closely by **Facilities** and **Location** (both 3.2). Student life received a moderate rating of 3.4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of students rating it 4–5 stars. The average rating is 4/5, indicating a highly satisfactory experience focused on practical learning and motivated instructors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a ~4/5 average rating, nearly all reviews praise the university's qualified staff and academic quality. Some mention challenges like course length and subject availability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
20%
100%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close