Universidad Tecnológica de Tula-Tepeji - UTTT vs University of San Diego vs Clark State Community College vs Ubiqum Code Academy vs Vancouver Island University - VIU

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Catolica Nordestana - UCNE (4.00)
Universidad Tecnológica de Tula-Tepeji - UTTT: wins 0/7 categories
University of San Diego: wins 0/7 categories
Clark State Community College: wins 0/7 categories
Ubiqum Code Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Vancouver Island University - VIU: wins 6/7 categories
Universidad Catolica Nordestana - UCNE: wins 1/7 categories
Academy of Fine Arts in Venice: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
San Diego, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Springfield, Ohio, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Barcelona, Spain
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
san francisco de macoris, Dominican Republic
4.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.20
Win
3.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.89
Win
3.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.30
4.00
Win
Not rated
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.20
Win
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.13
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive faculty and community
  • +Small class sizes
  • +Valuable academic resources
  • +Good campus, service, and infrastructure.

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Unsupportive and unprofessional instructors.
  • -Excessive and unreasonable program demands.
  • -Lack of essential institutional support and fairness.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hindered the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff were common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university garners solid reviews across multiple facets. Its location stands out with the highest rating, suggesting a desirable setting. While several areas, including professors and internationality, score well at 3.5, others like accommodation and facilities show room for improvement with the lowest scores. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture, particularly regarding its external environment.

Overall, the university presents a consistent performance across most categories. Student life emerges as its strongest aspect, scoring a 4 out of 5, indicating a vibrant and engaging campus experience. Conversely, its weakest areas are facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and value, all receiving a rating of 3. This suggests areas for potential improvement to further enhance the student experience and offerings.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community, approachable faculty, and small class sizes. About 30% of feedback is negative, citing issues with faculty support and program demands.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this university is positively viewed, with praise for campus, service, and infrastructure. Online classes during COVID presented some challenges for analysis.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
30%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
30%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Pick and choose their favorites

What a waste of money and time taking the LPN program. Unless you like to suck up to the instructors forget getting additional help from them, or any help at all. They yell at you, are condescending and treat you like a child. Not an "adult learning" environment like they tell you. Be prepared to to most of your work without instructors in the lab in 2nd year, they constantly disappear. And their expectations are above and beyond what the BCCNM require. I feel they fail students to make the University more money. The way I watched them treat those of different skin color was repulsive as well. Don't waste your money unless you're white and like to kiss a**. Only one instructor out of the whole program actually cares about any of the students. Definitely will need to upgrade my pharmacology elsewhere as that class was a joke.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close