Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista - UPSJB vs Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL vs Universidad César Vallejo - UCV vs Universidad Ricardo Palma - URP vs Universidad del Pacífico - UP

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista - UPSJB: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad César Vallejo - UCV: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Ricardo Palma - URP: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad del Pacífico - UP: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
Escuela Nacional Superior de Arte Dramatico: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.56
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.17
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.78
Win
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.50
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.22
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Competitive and improving curriculum
  • +Affordable tuition for medical studies
  • +Strong international focus and global opportunities
  • +Practical, entrepreneurship-driven programs
  • +High-quality teaching and modern infrastructure
  • +Supportive and engaging professors
  • +Affordable education and abundant opportunities
  • +Inclusive and collaborative learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Academic excellence and international recognition
  • +Highly qualified professors with real-world experience
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of support and poor communication negatively impact student well-being.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and administrative issues often cause frustration.
  • -Lack of student support and unclear academic expectations are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across all surveyed categories, the institution received uniformly neutral ratings of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent scoring suggests an average or unremarkable performance across every aspect evaluated.

This institution achieves an exceptional score of 5.0 for Internationality, its strongest area. Facilities also stand out with a high rating of 4.67. Conversely, Accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.0, representing its weakest point. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated consistently well at 4.5, with Location also scoring solidly at 4.17.

This institution presents a generally positive picture, excelling particularly in **Value** with a rating of 4.75 and strong marks for **Professors** (4.5) and **Student Life** (4.25). Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3. Other aspects like Facilities, Internationality, and Location fall within the good to very good range.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a uniformly low rating across all assessed aspects, with no individual category demonstrating any particular strength. Areas including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received the lowest possible score, indicating a significant need for improvement in every dimension.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). The positive review highlights a competitive curriculum and feasible pricing for medicine, while suggesting improvements in infrastructure.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Recurring themes include strong international opportunities, dual degree programs, and a focus on entrepreneurship and practical learning. No negative feedback was provided.

All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the inclusive environment, knowledgeable and engaging professors, and ample academic and extracurricular opportunities. The university is also commended for its affordability and support for student success.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Universidad del Pacifico is praised for academic excellence and highly qualified professors. No negative feedback was provided.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
89%
100%
0%
100%
67%
0%
4★
100%
11%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close