United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Tohoku University - TU vs ISG International Business School vs Tokyo Zokei University vs Mount Mary University

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 2/6 categories
Tohoku University - TU: wins 3/6 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 1/6 categories
Tokyo Zokei University: wins 0/6 categories
Mount Mary University: wins 0/6 categories
Yamagata University - YAMADAI: wins 0/6 categories
Sup de Vinci: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Advanced Molecular Chemistry
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Paris, France
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Web Development
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.75
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.75
Win
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.50
4.50
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Student life
4.25
4.50
Win
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +Excellent academic reputation and research opportunities
  • +Supportive learning environment and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching study abroad experience
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and supportive instructors.
  • +Small class sizes and calm learning environment.
  • +Relevant, practical, and up-to-date curriculum.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of maintenance are significant concerns.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration and faculty causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores across several key aspects. **Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all received a strong 4.5 rating**, indicating excellent performance in these areas. The **Value for money stands out with a perfect score of 5**. The **Location and Accommodation are rated at 4**, which are solid but represent the comparatively weaker areas.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a solid performance in several key areas. Professors receive a strong rating of 4, indicating high quality instruction. Facilities, location, and value are all rated a respectable 3. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, both scoring a 2. Overall, the university offers a good experience with notable strengths in its academic staff.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring themes highlight outstanding experiences, a good learning environment, and helpful faculty.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate interesting classes, accessible teachers, and practical skills for professional preparation. Small class sizes also contribute to a calm environment.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
33%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
67%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close