IHE Delft Institute for Water Education vs Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University - BSMRSTU vs KCC Institute of technology and management vs Ebonyi State University - EBSU vs David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences - DUFUH

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Evangel University Akaeze - EUA (5.00)
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education: wins 4/7 categories
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University - BSMRSTU: wins 0/7 categories
KCC Institute of technology and management: wins 0/7 categories
Ebonyi State University - EBSU: wins 0/7 categories
David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences - DUFUH: wins 0/7 categories
Evangel University Akaeze - EUA: wins 3/7 categories
Manouba University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Bachelor of Biology
Best programme: Nursing
Tunis, Tunisia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
2.67
Not rated
3.06
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
Location
4.57
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.19
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
2.67
Not rated
3.83
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.86
Win
1.67
Not rated
3.44
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Student life
4.43
Win
2.33
Not rated
3.44
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Value
4.00
1.67
Not rated
3.78
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Win
2.67
Not rated
2.94
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Collaborative global environment and networking opportunities
  • +Highly practical, module-based curriculum with theoretical and experimental learning
  • +Quality education and learning experiences
  • +Lack of qualified instructors and subpar study environment.

Nothing to show

  • +Quality teaching and dedicated, approachable lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and hands-on experience
  • +Positive campus life and diverse student community

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable lecturers.
  • +Positive impact on emotional, spiritual, and academic growth.
  • +Serene environment and modern facilities.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Education quality does not match the high tuition fees.
  • -Teaching quality is lacking despite professors' experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Traditional teaching methods are boring and uncreative.
  • -Campus environment suffers from student clashes and political conflict.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated and overcrowded facilities, with a lack of on-campus accommodation.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a constant problem.
  • -There are frequent complaints about poor communication and lack of support.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, with its **Internationality** being its most exceptional attribute. The **Location** also garners high marks, reflecting a desirable setting. Conversely, while still solid, **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** represent areas with slightly less exceptional scores, indicating room for potential enhancement compared to its standout international appeal and prime location.

An assessment of this university indicates a mixed performance across several key areas. Its strongest points are **Location**, receiving a rating of 3.33. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Value** emerge as the weakest, both scoring 1.67. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation fall in the mid-range at 2.67, while Student Life is rated at 2.33.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates a particularly strong showing in **Location**, receiving a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Professors and Value also received positive marks. Student Life and Internationality are rated moderately, while Facilities fall slightly below the average.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. Value for money stands out with a top rating, closely followed by excellent Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving high marks. Areas performing less strongly include Accomodation, which received a lower score compared to the others. Location also registered as a solid, though not outstanding, aspect of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting a strong global and multicultural environment, quality education with a practical, modular approach, and collaborative learning. One ~14% negative review cited high costs and concerns about teaching quality.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is mixed. Approximately 33.3% of reviews express dissatisfaction with disorganization, poor administration, and a lack of a strong study environment. Some positive aspects were noted regarding student involvement.

Nothing to show

With a 3.83 average rating from 18 reviews, ~74% are positive, highlighting quality teaching and professors. A single negative review (~5.6%) mentioned infrastructure challenges and overcrowded lecture halls.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average. Students praise the high learning standards, qualified lecturers, and modern facilities. One review also notes a serene environment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
71%
0%
0%
33%
0%
100%
0%
4★
14%
33%
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
33%
0%
39%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
33%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
1★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

I am confused to illustrate my experience: Mixed reaction

My experience was very mixed and confusing. I saw both the bright and dark faces of the university in terms of its performances and treatment of students. The university is very new and has a sophisticated architectural structure that can attract anyone. But the internal aspects are so vulnerable. Politics and political influences in all recruitments in the university, student politics, and mispractice of power are the dark parts of this university. On the other hand, there are some teachers who are very different and exceptionally concerned about students' careers and future goals. They try to help students find out their destination. Their classes are also incomparable in comparison to the politically recruited teachers. The residential services are satisfactory though it is controlled by the political leaders among the students and that's why general students do not get the seat that they deserve.

Nothing to show

Life of a medical student in EBSU

Being a medical student in my university is very intense. This can be both a good thing and a bad thing. With an intensive curriculum that will keep you very engaged academically there's really not much going on socially apart from the annual student health week program organized by the student body. I like that my school has started building a system that would make it possible for medical students to finish their studies and graduate in record time instead of the usual situation where they end up staying like 2-3 years extra. I don't like the daily schedule of lectures though. Lectures start by 7am and ends by 5pm mostly everyday. This makes it very hard for students especially those in clinical medicine to have a school - life balance. There's literally no time for extra curricular activities which makes it hard for students to explore other options without it affecting their academics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close