Gunadarma University vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Jakarta State Polytechnic vs Jakarta State University vs Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama (5.00)
Gunadarma University: wins 0/6 categories
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/6 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/6 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 6/6 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 0/6 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Mercu Buana: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Food Industry
Best programme: International Relations
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.17
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.50
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.50
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
2.50
4.67
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.17
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.50
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.17
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
67%
100%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close