London School of Commerce - LSC vs St Joseph's College of Commerce - SJCC vs RV University vs Ramaiah College of Law vs Kristu Jayanti College - KJC

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bengaluru City University (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/5 categories
St Joseph's College of Commerce - SJCC: wins 1/5 categories
RV University: wins 0/5 categories
Ramaiah College of Law: wins 0/5 categories
Kristu Jayanti College - KJC: wins 0/5 categories
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore: wins 0/5 categories
Bengaluru City University: wins 4/5 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: BCom
Bangalore, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration and Bachelor of Legislative Law
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Social Work
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.25
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.75
4.75
Not rated
4.67
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
3.25
4.25
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.50
3.50
Not rated
4.00
2.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.75
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.33
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Value
2.75
4.50
Not rated
4.33
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.00
3.00
Not rated
4.67
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Excellent faculty and subject knowledge
  • +Valuable real-world exposure and opportunities
  • +Supportive and familial campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Excellent professional development opportunities
  • +Broadening of opportunities and challenging activities
  • +Supportive professors and high teaching standards
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse activities and clubs
  • +Good infrastructure and facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Balance of theory and practical knowledge
  • +Real-world experience and skill development
  • +Enriching exposure and rich learning
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are inconsistent, with many finding it irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and poor communication from staff are a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning and student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution excels in its location and student life, both receiving top marks. Facilities and professors are also highly rated. However, accommodation presents a significant area for improvement, scoring considerably lower. Internationality is moderately rated, while the value proposition is strong.

Nothing to show

A generally positive university profile is evident, with professors receiving the highest possible rating of 5. Location and accommodation also score strongly. Areas with slightly lower, though still good, scores include internationality. Facilities, student life, and value are all rated consistently well, indicating a solid all-around experience.

This institution excels in its facilities and student life, both receiving high marks of 5 and 4.5 respectively. Its value for money is also rated very positively at 4.5. However, its internationality is a notable area for improvement, scoring a lower 2.5, and accommodation also received a moderate rating of 3. Professors and location are rated solidly in the mid-range.

Nothing to show

Exceptional scores distinguish this institution, particularly in its outstanding **facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value**, all receiving a perfect five. The only area not reaching maximum is **student life**, which scored a strong four. Overall, the university presents a highly commendable academic and practical environment, with its academic offerings and resources standing out as particularly robust.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, nearly 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable faculty, strong networking, and valuable real-world exposure. Some mention overcrowding and suggest syllabus improvements.

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising the supportive environment, helpful faculty, and exceptional opportunities for professional and personal development.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight the excellent academic and personal development environment, supportive professors, vibrant campus life, and good infrastructure. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights an enriching experience with a good balance of theory and practical knowledge, including valuable fieldwork placements.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
67%
0%
0%
100%
4★
25%
50%
0%
33%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close