London School of Commerce - LSC vs St Joseph's College of Commerce - SJCC vs RV University vs The Oxford College of Pharmacy vs Kristu Jayanti College - KJC

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: St Joseph's College of Commerce - SJCC (4.50)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/5 categories
St Joseph's College of Commerce - SJCC: wins 2/5 categories
RV University: wins 0/5 categories
The Oxford College of Pharmacy: wins 2/5 categories
Kristu Jayanti College - KJC: wins 1/5 categories
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore: wins 0/5 categories
St Joseph’s University - SJU: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: BCom
Bangalore, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.25
Not rated
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
4.75
Not rated
4.75
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
4.25
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Win
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.75
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Excellent faculty and subject knowledge
  • +Valuable real-world exposure and opportunities
  • +Supportive and familial campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent academic performance and teaching support
  • +Strong sense of community and excellent resources
  • +High-quality infrastructure and facilities
  • +Supportive professors and high teaching standards
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse activities and clubs
  • +Good infrastructure and facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and poor communication from staff are a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution excels in its location and student life, both receiving top marks. Facilities and professors are also highly rated. However, accommodation presents a significant area for improvement, scoring considerably lower. Internationality is moderately rated, while the value proposition is strong.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates a strong profile, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The area with the lowest rating is **Professors**, suggesting a potential point for improvement.

This institution excels in its facilities and student life, both receiving high marks of 5 and 4.5 respectively. Its value for money is also rated very positively at 4.5. However, its internationality is a notable area for improvement, scoring a lower 2.5, and accommodation also received a moderate rating of 3. Professors and location are rated solidly in the mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, nearly 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable faculty, strong networking, and valuable real-world exposure. Some mention overcrowding and suggest syllabus improvements.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.75/5, approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting great performance, a strong tutorial system, and good infrastructure. Some minor concerns were noted regarding student behavior and workload.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight the excellent academic and personal development environment, supportive professors, vibrant campus life, and good infrastructure. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
50%
0%
75%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close