Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Centro Colombo Americano vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL (5.00)
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 1/3 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 1/3 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 0/3 categories
Centro Colombo Americano: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 1/3 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 0/3 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Economics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.60
4.00
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.00
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.67
5.00
4.60
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.67
5.00
Win
3.20
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.20
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.17
5.00
4.40
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
3.60
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

Nothing to show

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
86%
0%
83%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
14%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
50%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close