LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Gunadarma University vs Yarsi University vs Pancasila University vs Jayabaya University

Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 0/3 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/3 categories
Yarsi University: wins 3/3 categories
Pancasila University: wins 0/3 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 0/3 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 0/3 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.17
5.00
4.00
5.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
4.50
5.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.75
4.50
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.75
4.00
5.00
Win
3.50
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.17
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.50
4.50
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.17
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
  • +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
  • +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
  • +Supportive and inspiring lecturers
  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
  • -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
4★
50%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close