LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Yarsi University vs Pancasila University vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Universitas MH Thamrin
Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
- +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
- +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
- +Cleanliness and modern facilities
- +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
- +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
- +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
- +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive and inspiring lecturers
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
- +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical learning and industry partnerships
- +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
- +Practical application and project engagement
- +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
- +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
- -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
- -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
- -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
- -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
- -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.
This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.
With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.
All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.
Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.
This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show