Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Jakarta State Polytechnic vs Universitas MH Thamrin vs Jayabaya University vs Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/6 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas MH Thamrin: wins 3/6 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 2/6 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 1/6 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun: wins 0/6 categories
University of Bunda Mulia - UBM: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.50
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
2.50
3.50
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry partnerships
  • +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close