Tarumanagara University - UNTAR vs Gunadarma University vs Esa Unggul University - UEU vs Jakarta State Polytechnic vs Universitas MH Thamrin
Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and accreditation
- +Supportive lecturers and peer collaboration
- +Diverse programs and international opportunities
- +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
- +Good facilities and helpful tutors
- +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
- +Accessible location and engaging classroom environment
- +Supportive and guiding lecturers
- +Opportunities for critical thinking and discussion
- +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
- +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
- +Improved campus facilities
- +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical learning and industry partnerships
- +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
- +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
- +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
- +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
- +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
- +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and delivery are often perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a problem.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
- -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
- -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in its Professors, Location, and Accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with very high marks. The university's Internationality is its relatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.6. Overall, it presents a highly appealing educational environment.
Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths across multiple facets. Its location and student life receive perfect scores, while facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. Value also stands out with a perfect score. While all areas are strong, the university truly excels in providing an exceptional student experience and an advantageous location.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.
Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students praise academic excellence and strong career preparation, highlighting supportive lecturers and vibrant campus life.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the strategic location and accessible campus. They also highlight caring lecturers who provide guidance and encourage critical thinking.
With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.
Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.
All I can say about my university was like the root of my wonderful journey in life. I first learned about connecting with people through education was started here. Learning to become someone who could be a helper in the future for other's life. And indeed, throughout the long journey after my campus life, I found many things to be grateful for. And I am so proud that I was one of the alumni from this university
Nothing to show
The esa unggul campus is one of the best private universities in the city of Jakarta with a strategic location, easily accessible by various modes of public transportation. With an attractive classroom atmosphere and professional classroom teachers, it creates an informative class.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show