State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN vs Gunadarma University vs Yarsi University vs Universitas Pertamina vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama (5.00)
State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN: wins 0/4 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/4 categories
Yarsi University: wins 4/4 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/4 categories
Tanri Abeng University - TAU: wins 0/4 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/4 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: English Literature
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Location
4.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Professors
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Internationality
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
3.00
Student life
5.00
4.17
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Integration of Islamic values with modern sciences
  • +Opportunities for personal, spiritual, and leadership growth
  • +Active student organizations and extracurricular involvement
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.
Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in Student Life and Internationality, this institution shines. Its professors, location, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded experience. The weakest area, Facilities, still received a respectable score, suggesting room for improvement but not a significant detractor from the overall positive assessment.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive reviews). Students highlight a unique blend of Islamic values and modern sciences, alongside active student organizations and community involvement opportunities.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
100%
50%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close