University of Indonesia - UI vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Gunadarma University vs Universitas Trilogi vs Krida Wacana Christian University
Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
- +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
- +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
- +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
- +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
- +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
- +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
- +Good facilities and helpful tutors
- +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
- +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
- +Improved campus facilities
- +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.
- -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
- -Substandard experience for international students.
- -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
- -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
- -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.
With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.
Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.
University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.
With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.
I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show