Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Krida Wacana Christian University

Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bina Nusantara University - UBN (4.70)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 5/7 categories
University of Indonesia - UI: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 1/7 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 0/7 categories
Krida Wacana Christian University: wins 1/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
STIE Indonesia Jakarta: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Art and Design
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.54
Win
4.22
4.28
4.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
Location
4.08
4.37
4.59
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
Professors
4.69
Win
4.50
4.17
4.33
4.00
3.50
4.50
Internationality
4.85
Win
4.33
4.17
3.67
3.00
2.50
4.00
Student life
4.23
4.42
4.17
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Value
4.62
Win
4.42
4.39
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.50
Accommodation
4.42
Win
4.14
4.13
3.33
4.00
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse programs and career prospects
  • +Engaging extracurriculars and personal growth opportunities
  • +Excellent lecturers and accommodating facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
  • +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
  • +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Real-world application and industry relevance
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication is a problem.
  • -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
  • -Substandard experience for international students.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Across multiple categories, this university garners strong evaluations. Internationality stands out as its most exceptional area, reflected in a near-perfect score. Professors and value also receive highly positive feedback. The university's weakest aspect, though still well-regarded, is its location. Student life, accommodation, and facilities are all rated very favorably as well.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.69/5. Students highlight abundant study programs, engaging student organizations, and supportive lecturers. Facilities are frequently praised as modern and accommodating, fostering personal growth and social connections.

University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.

Rating distribution
5★
69%
64%
56%
33%
0%
0%
50%
4★
31%
31%
39%
67%
0%
50%
50%
3★
0%
3%
6%
0%
100%
50%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

International student office

I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close