State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG vs Universitas Trilogi vs Krida Wacana Christian University

Side-by-side comparison from 8 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR (4.50)
State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN: wins 1/5 categories
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 4/5 categories
Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG: wins 0/5 categories
Universitas Trilogi: wins 0/5 categories
Krida Wacana Christian University: wins 0/5 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/5 categories
Universitas Nasional - UNAS: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: English Literature
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.25
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.50
Not rated
Student life
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Integration of Islamic values with modern sciences
  • +Opportunities for personal, spiritual, and leadership growth
  • +Active student organizations and extracurricular involvement
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in Student Life and Internationality, this institution shines. Its professors, location, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded experience. The weakest area, Facilities, still received a respectable score, suggesting room for improvement but not a significant detractor from the overall positive assessment.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive reviews). Students highlight a unique blend of Islamic values and modern sciences, alongside active student organizations and community involvement opportunities.

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
50%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close