Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG vs Universitas Pertamina vs Krida Wacana Christian University

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bina Nusantara University - UBN (4.60)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 5/7 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 1/7 categories
Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/7 categories
Krida Wacana Christian University: wins 1/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Nasional - UNAS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
Win
4.28
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.15
4.59
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.64
Win
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.71
Win
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.50
Not rated
Student life
4.21
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.57
Win
4.39
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.38
Win
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
56%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
36%
39%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
0%
100%
50%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close