Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Universidad Alejandro de Humboldt - UAH vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA vs Universidad Católica de Cuenca

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES (4.70)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 5/6 categories
Universidad Alejandro de Humboldt - UAH: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade Aberta - UAb: wins 0/6 categories
University of Azuay - UDA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: BA International Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.80
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.32
5.00
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.10
5.00
Professors
4.27
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.23
4.00
Internationality
4.14
4.40
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.15
4.00
Student life
4.36
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.00
3.50
Value
4.10
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.38
4.00
Accommodation
3.88
4.40
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.89
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +Excellent academic programs and dedicated professors
  • +Strong career preparation and professional development
  • +Opportunities for practical application and societal contribution
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent facilities, well-located campus, and a strong sense of community.
  • +Flexible distance learning model with high academic quality and well-qualified faculty.
  • +Practical and professional focus in programs, preparing students for the future.
  • +Strong academics, practical education, and qualified professors
  • +Focus on global/regional understanding and interdisciplinary connections
  • +Collaborative learning and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and poor communication are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are often criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are sometimes seen as ineffective or unengaging.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Unresponsive and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff.
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

Across all evaluated aspects, the institution presents a uniform score of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses emerge from the provided ratings. The consistent lack of points suggests a complete absence of positive or negative feedback in the categories of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with its strongest area being **Value**, earning a 4.38. **Professors** also received high marks. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest rating at 3.89, suggesting this is the area for potential improvement, though other aspects like Facilities and Student Life remain solid.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both receiving a solid but comparatively lower rating. Overall, the university offers good **Value** for its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of reviews are positive. Students praise the varied curriculum and academic level, with some suggestions for salary increases and improved student union involvement.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 13 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent facilities, wonderful teachers, and the convenience of distance learning, fostering a supportive community and preparing them for the future. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight enriching academic experiences, deep understanding of global issues, and personal growth. They also praise qualified professors and modern facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
67%
50%
50%
0%
54%
50%
4★
42%
33%
25%
50%
0%
31%
50%
3★
8%
0%
25%
0%
0%
15%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close