Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs University of Calicut vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES (4.70)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/6 categories
University of Calicut: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 5/6 categories
Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/6 categories
University of Azuay - UDA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Thenhipalam, India
4.50
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: BA International Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.20
4.80
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.32
4.33
5.00
4.20
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.27
4.40
4.60
Win
3.14
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.14
4.20
4.40
2.57
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.36
4.30
4.60
Win
2.50
4.50
Not rated
3.50
Value
4.10
4.20
4.60
Win
3.29
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.88
4.00
4.40
Win
2.17
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Vast course offerings and strong academic departments
  • +Excellent infrastructure and campus environment
  • +Quality study materials and fair examination processes
  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +Excellent academic staff and quality of education
  • +Practical, well-equipped labs and strong technical programs
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and a rewarding experience
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academics, practical education, and qualified professors
  • +Focus on global/regional understanding and interdisciplinary connections
  • +Collaborative learning and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were a significant concern.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management practices caused frustration.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and relevant course content was disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues, with a lack of consideration for student opinions and an unsupportive staff attitude.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and disorganized class structures.
  • -Insufficient facilities and equipment, particularly lacking for practical subjects.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Unresponsive and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff.
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

Academic strengths are evident, with a high rating for Professors at 4.4. Student Life also scores well at 4.3, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Facilities and Internationality both received a solid 4.2, while Location is also favorably rated at 4.33. Accommodations and Value are slightly lower but still positive, at 4.0 and 4.2 respectively.

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

This institution presents a mixed review based on student feedback. Its strongest areas include Location, which received a high rating, and Value, indicating good return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation appears to be a significant weakness, scoring the lowest. Student Life and Internationality also received comparatively lower marks, while Facilities and Professors fall in the mid-range.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both receiving a solid but comparatively lower rating. Overall, the university offers good **Value** for its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, feedback is ~90% positive. Students praise course variety and quality education. A small amount of negative feedback noted potential for improvement.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

With an average rating of 3.43/5, roughly 74% of students offer positive feedback, highlighting strong academic foundations, knowledgeable staff, and practical programs. However, approximately 28.6% of reviews note issues with administration, outdated facilities, and unsupportive staff.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight enriching academic experiences, deep understanding of global issues, and personal growth. They also praise qualified professors and modern facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
60%
67%
29%
50%
0%
50%
4★
42%
30%
33%
14%
50%
0%
50%
3★
8%
10%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Supportive professors and practical learning

he Polytechnic University of Tirana provides a solid foundation in technical and engineering fields. The professors are knowledgeable and supportive, and the study programs are practical. However, the administration can sometimes be slow, and more modern facilities would improve the student experience. Overall, I would recommend this university to students who want a strong academic background.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close