University of Management and Technology - UMT vs Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs Forman Christian College vs Superior University vs CMH Lahore Medical College

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD (5.00)
University of Management and Technology - UMT: wins 0/3 categories
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 0/3 categories
Forman Christian College: wins 2/3 categories
Superior University: wins 0/3 categories
CMH Lahore Medical College: wins 1/3 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/3 categories
University of Education Lahore: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Business and Marketing
Lahore, Pakistan
3.90
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Physiotherapy
Best programme: Education in Educational Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
3.56
4.50
4.29
4.13
3.00
3.00
4.50
Location
3.39
4.00
4.63
3.38
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Professors
4.00
5.00
4.59
4.50
5.00
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.50
4.00
4.06
Win
3.75
3.00
1.00
4.00
Student life
3.56
5.00
4.59
4.00
5.00
3.00
5.00
Value
3.89
4.50
4.53
Win
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.22
4.00
3.75
3.63
3.00
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse programs and dedicated, approachable faculty
  • +Engaging campus life and student support
  • +Holistic development and transformative experiences
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
  • +Lively campus life and extracurricular opportunities.
  • +Emphasis on critical thinking and practical learning.
  • +Cooperative and qualified faculty
  • +Career growth focus and practical learning
  • +Positive campus environment
  • +High affiliation and accreditation
  • +Modern campus and facilities
  • +Qualified and experienced faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive teaching and academic focus
  • +Improvement in punctuality and information flow
  • +Resolution of student issues
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause a lack of action on student requests.
  • -Frequent and unjustified fee increases are a major concern.
  • -Some teachers lack fundamental subject knowledge.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff was a problem.
  • -Illiterate, unethical, and unprofessional staff is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum or teaching quality is a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows its strongest performance in value for money, alongside positive ratings for professors and student life. Facilities and internationality also receive solid scores. However, areas such as location and accommodation fall slightly below the average, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

This institution receives particularly high marks in several key areas. Its location and professors are lauded as exceptionally strong points, closely followed by student life and value. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest rated aspect, while facilities and internationality also show room for improvement.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4.5. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received commendable scores. Conversely, **Location** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.375. Other categories like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Student Life** fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive student experience with a standout academic and financial offering, offset by the geographical setting.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its faculty expertise, campus location, and vibrant student life, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, areas such as facilities and accommodation are rated moderately, indicating room for improvement. Internationality also sits at a moderate level. Overall, the university offers good value, reflected in its solid four-star rating.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in **Student Life** with a perfect score. Facilities also stand out at an impressive 4.5. Conversely, while still strong, Professors, Location, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value all hover around a solid 4. This suggests a vibrant student experience and excellent resources, with other aspects performing reliably well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most students (~74%) report a vibrant atmosphere with dedicated faculty, diverse programs, and engaging campus life. A small percentage (~11%) noted issues with subject teacher knowledge and administrative management.

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising the strong academic reputation, supportive faculty, and lively campus. Approximately 0% of feedback expressed concerns.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting cooperative, well-qualified teachers, a focus on career growth, and practical learning. One negative review criticized staff qualifications.

The single review is highly positive, awarding 4/5 stars. This feedback highlights strong affiliations, modern facilities, and qualified faculty, with no negative points raised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight effective teaching and a supportive environment.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
100%
71%
38%
0%
0%
50%
4★
33%
0%
24%
38%
100%
0%
50%
3★
22%
0%
6%
13%
0%
100%
0%
2★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
6%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Doctor Of Pharmacy

I think UMT provides a good learning environment with modern facilities and a strong focus on professional development. The faculty is supportive, and there are plenty of opportunities for growth. However, the fee structure can be a bit high for some students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University management and staff

It is very sad to say that one of the best Pakistan institutes of education has such illiterate, unethical and stupid staff in its university. They need to hire qualified staff, so that they can maintain their good standing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close