University of Hildesheim vs Kharkiv National Medical University - KHMU vs University of Bihać vs Techno India University - TIU vs Lehman College

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Hildesheim: wins 3/5 categories
Kharkiv National Medical University - KHMU: wins 0/5 categories
University of Bihać: wins 0/5 categories
Techno India University - TIU: wins 0/5 categories
Lehman College: wins 1/5 categories
Mari Private University - MPU: wins 0/5 categories
University of Makeni - UniMak: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Hildesheim, Germany
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Translation
Bihac, Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
New York City, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Information Systems
Best programme: Bachelor of Law (Honours)
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.00
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Location
3.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Professors
5.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.00
Not rated
3.50
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
3.00
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
2.00
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
1.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Professional, helpful, dedicated teachers and useful classes
  • +Strong program reputation
  • +Highly qualified and professional teaching staff
  • +Excellent practical training opportunities and facilities
  • +Supportive administrative environment and encouragement of student initiatives
  • +Excellent technical and professional programs
  • +Disappointing facilities for some faculties

Nothing to show

  • +Helpful and accessible staff and professors
  • +Flexible schedule and credit transfer options
  • +Safe and positive campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Organized administration and serene learning environment
  • +Astonishing performance despite young age
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clarity and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent and ineffective teaching methods are a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common point of dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is noted.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic success.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent scores for its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation**, all earning a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life and internationality, however, are rated moderately at 3, suggesting these areas could be further developed. Location also scores a 3. Overall, the university offers exceptional value, mirroring its top marks in key on-campus resources.

Presenting a uniform assessment, all surveyed categories at this institution received a rating of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent score across the board suggests a lack of standout features or significant deficiencies in any of these evaluated aspects.

This institution scores exceptionally well in location, receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, student life presents the lowest-rated aspect at 3. Other areas like facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value are rated a solid 3.5, while professors are well-regarded with a 4-star average.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths, particularly in its **Internationality**, which received a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are also highly regarded with 4.5 ratings. **Accomodation** earned a solid 4, while **Professors** also scored well at 4. The university offers excellent **Value** at 4.5.

Nothing to show

This institution excels particularly in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, all receiving perfect scores. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Accommodation**, along with **Internationality** and **Value**, which all scored moderately. The university demonstrates significant strengths in its academic staff, campus surroundings, and student engagement opportunities.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students highlight useful classes, professional and dedicated teachers, and the university's strong reputation. No negative feedback was provided.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the qualified teachers, good training base, and support from the dean's office.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. One review highlights strong faculty organization alongside notable issues with facilities at other departments.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the helpful staff and professors, flexible scheduling, and a safe environment. Easy credit transfer and readily available support are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

With one review at 4/5 stars, the university is praised for its well-organized administration and serene learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
100%
50%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close