Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB vs Escuela Politécnica Nacional - EPN vs Universidad Experimental de Guayana - UNEG vs European Institute of journalism - IEJ vs Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Industrial Rodolfo Loero Arismendi
Side-by-side comparison from 209 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable professors.
- +Pleasant campus and good university environment.
- +Accessible resources and helpful staff.
- +Academic excellence & scientific/humanistic standards
- +Social support & cultural activities
- +Central location & diverse career options
- +High-quality teaching and career programs
- +Positive campus environment and student experience
- +Opportunities for personal growth and new adventures
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +International exposure and industry links
- +Vibrant student life and campus facilities
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student support from faculty.
- -Substandard facilities, including issues with housing and wifi.
- -Inadequate educational content and inconsistent academic rigor.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary complications.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback creates confusion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students are frustrated by programs with internship requirements leading to graduation without post-grad work visa options.
Nothing to show
Student life stands out as a significant strength, receiving the highest rating. Accommodation presents the weakest area for the institution. Other rated aspects, including facilities, internationality, and value, also garnered favorable scores, indicating a generally positive university experience.
This institution presents a uniform, undeveloped profile across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths. Conversely, every category equally represents the institution's weakest areas, indicating a comprehensive lack of development or positive perception in these fundamental university components.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its teaching quality and geographic positioning, both receiving a strong 4 out of 5. However, its facilities and student life offerings are areas for improvement, each scoring a lower 2.5. Accommodations and its international profile are moderately rated at 3 and 3.5 respectively, with value for money also reflecting a decent 3.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Academic strengths shine through with high marks for professors, indicating excellent instruction. However, accommodation falls significantly short of other areas, suggesting it is the weakest point. The university also received solid, mid-range scores for facilities, location, student life, internationality, and value, presenting a generally consistent but not outstanding experience outside of teaching quality.
Nothing to show
With ~79% positive ratings, students praise supportive professors, great campus environments, and accessible resources. A small percentage of reviews mention poor teaching quality and inadequate faculty feedback.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the university's strong academic programs, social opportunities, and contribution to national development.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight opportunities to study desired careers and excellent teaching programs, despite some mentioning a need for better facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most reviews highlight strong academic programs, supportive lecturers, and valuable international exposure (~74% positive). Some also appreciate practical learning and campus facilities. A smaller portion of feedback (~16.7%) mentions issues with administrative processes and internship support.
Nothing to show
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
HUGE RED FLAG for International Students (The "Internship Trap" - AVOID THE COUNTRY) Don’t get blinded by the marketing. I’m an international student who just finished here, and the system is designed to leave you stranded. Here is the reality INTI won't tell you before you pay: The Internship Trap: They host programs that require an internship to graduate, but the Malaysian government doesn't offer a post-grad work visa for most nationalities. The university knows this but provides zero solutions. You’re essentially paying for a degree you can’t legally complete without a miracle. Degree Hostage: After you finish, they hold your actual degree certificate hostage for about 8 months. They’ll give you a "Completion Letter," but good luck using that for a job or a visa in another country. Most places want the real deal, which INTI takes forever to release. The Graduation Tax: Because your visa expires right after classes end and the degree isn't ready for months, you’re forced to fly home and then fly back (3x 26-hour flights in my case) just to walk across a stage for a ceremony you already paid for. Zero Duty of Care: They are happy to take your tuition, but once the visa/internship issues hit, you’re on your own. If you aren't from one of the few "lucky" countries that get the 1-year Graduate Pass, STAY AWAY. You’ll end up with no work experience, no physical degree for nearly a year, and a massive bill for flights. Look at Education Malaysia Global Services (EMGS) rules very carefully before signing anything. I have also seen unqualified students buy their way into the final year knowing full well that they know nothing about first year topics. And now the CEO is so money hungry that he is trying to offer high credit subjects in short semesters which is completely infeasible, just to make a few extra bucks. The curriculum is horrible and just makes the student life more impossibly busy - 6 subjects in 1 semester. Especially the electives that are a complete waste of time and not really going to matter in your degree while stealing a lot of your attention. The facilities are also just horrible everywhere, in a state of disrepair, but somehow the student numbers keep increasing as well as the tuition. ALL THEY WANT IS YOUR MONEY
Nothing to show
