Universidad Católica Santa Rosa - Ucsar vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale vs University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET vs Douala University - UD

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM (5.00)
Universidad Católica Santa Rosa - Ucsar: wins 1/5 categories
Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM: wins 4/5 categories
École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale: wins 0/5 categories
University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET: wins 0/5 categories
Douala University - UD: wins 0/5 categories
University Institute of the Gulf of Guinea - IUG: wins 0/5 categories
Skyhigh University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Sociology and Social Research
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Douala, Cameroon
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Location
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.50
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.67
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
1.67
3.50
Not rated
Student life
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.33
4.50
Not rated
Value
5.00
5.00
Not rated
3.50
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
2.67
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Affordable tuition fees
  • +Relevant and updated curricula
  • +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
  • +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
  • +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Adaptability and resilience fostered by challenging logistics
  • +Engaging learning environment despite resource constraints
  • +Community and student resourcefulness
  • +Excellent campus environment and facilities
  • +High-quality, expert faculty and rigorous academics
  • +Career-focused education and skill development

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a major problem.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career preparation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of student support and unresponsive staff are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing students for future careers.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **accommodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Value for money** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **facilities** and **student life** are identified as areas for potential improvement, each scoring a moderate three out of five. **Professors** and **internationality** fall in the middle range, indicating a solid but not exceptional performance in these aspects.

Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university's strengths lie in its prime location, receiving a high rating of 4.33. The student life and professor quality also score well, both above 3.3. Conversely, internationality is a significant weakness, with a score of 1.67, and accommodation is also rated low at 2.67. Facilities and overall value sit at a moderate 3.

This institution presents a commendable overall profile. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, include **Professors** and **Student Life**. On the other end, **Facilities** and **Internationality** are noted as comparatively weaker, though still solid with 3.5 ratings. The **Location** and **Accomodation** received strong marks at 4, while **Value** also scored well at 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4/5. Positive comments highlight satisfactory distance learning options and reasonable tuition fees.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.33/5 average rating from 3 reviews, ~33% were positive. One positive review highlighted adaptability and resilience in navigating hall challenges. No negative feedback was provided.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.5/5, student reviews highlight a great experience. Recurring themes include a calm, neat campus conducive to studying, well-equipped facilities, and qualified, committed lecturers.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
0%
33%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close