Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA

Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/7 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 2/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
4.00
4.67
4.17
4.88
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.92
4.60
4.67
3.67
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.86
4.20
4.67
4.00
4.63
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.21
Win
4.00
3.67
2.71
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.85
Win
3.80
4.67
4.00
4.38
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.79
Win
4.40
4.33
4.57
4.75
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
3.85
2.20
3.67
3.20
4.29
Win
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values
  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Excellent instructors and well-equipped facilities enhance learning.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness is highly valued.
  • +Innovative programs and support for students entering the workforce are appreciated.

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are consistently criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, scoring an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.625, alongside a strong **Value** rating of 4.75. The **Location** and **Student Life** also fare well. However, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

All 8 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students frequently praise excellent facilities, capable instructors, and strong preparation for the workforce. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
81%
54%
100%
38%
50%
0%
100%
4★
13%
38%
0%
25%
50%
0%
0%
3★
6%
8%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close