Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO vs EBS European Business School vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Curtin University Mauritius - CURTIN
Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied learning focused on real-world skills
- +Supportive and knowledgeable teaching staff
- +Opportunities for success and career preparation
- +Enthusiastic and supportive professors
- +Outstanding international environment
- +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
- +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
- +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.
Nothing to show
- +Career preparation and employability support
- +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
- +Professional and accommodating lecturers
Nothing to show
- +Accessible and supportive instructors.
- +Small class sizes and calm learning environment.
- +Relevant, practical, and up-to-date curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Negative interactions with instructors and poor course structure are frustrating.
- -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
- -Lack of practical application and career preparation.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of student life and campus events.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
- -Outdated or inadequate facilities.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with Student Life and Location receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and Internationality also rank very favorably. While Accomodation is rated lower than other categories, it remains a solid score, indicating an overall positive university experience. Professors' ratings, while good, are the lowest among the surveyed aspects.
Across the board, this institution receives perfect scores in all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. This suggests an exceptionally strong offering with no discernible weaknesses according to these ratings. The university appears to excel uniformly, providing an outstanding experience in every dimension.
Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating. Conversely, areas such as facilities, student life, and internationality received notably lower scores, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects. Accommodation and value are rated moderately, while location falls somewhere between the strongest and weakest categories.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a solid performance in several key areas. Professors receive a strong rating of 4, indicating high quality instruction. Facilities, location, and value are all rated a respectable 3. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, both scoring a 2. Overall, the university offers a good experience with notable strengths in its academic staff.
With an average rating of 4.47/5 from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students highlight the practical curriculum, supportive faculty, and opportunities for success. No negative reviews were provided.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight an enthusiastic and supportive faculty, and outstanding internationalism.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.
Nothing to show
Two positive reviews highlight employability services and relevant program content. One negative review expresses frustration with a lack of campus events, representing approximately 33% of feedback.
Nothing to show
With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate interesting classes, accessible teachers, and practical skills for professional preparation. Small class sizes also contribute to a calm environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The program has been tailored to accommodate the ever-changing world of tech and fully equips pupils with the relevant industry specific knowledge they require as well as a broadened perspective on a plethora of subjects through electives and workshops. The campus is very small and there are very few activities to participate in. This makes the school-life balance hard to maintain as the semester is very intensive and requires consistent study. The lecturers are very professional, accommodating, eager to help and approachable.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show