Universidad de Castilla La Mancha - UCLM vs Université Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella vs Portucalense Infante D. Henrique University - UPT vs University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad vs St. Patrick's Pontifical University Maynooth

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad (4.50)
Universidad de Castilla La Mancha - UCLM: wins 1/6 categories
Université Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella: wins 0/6 categories
Portucalense Infante D. Henrique University - UPT: wins 1/6 categories
University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad: wins 4/6 categories
St. Patrick's Pontifical University Maynooth: wins 0/6 categories
School of Electrical and Energetic Engineering of Oran: wins 0/6 categories
University of Science and Technology Mohamed Boudiaf - Usto-MB: wins 0/6 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
3.80
Not rated
3.60
4.00
Win
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Location
4.00
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Professors
3.00
Not rated
3.60
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
2.80
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Student life
3.60
Not rated
3.60
4.00
Win
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Value
3.80
Not rated
3.40
4.50
Win
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.20
3.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Affordable and convenient city living
  • +Diverse and comprehensive academic programs
  • +Engaging student life and events

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming environment and friendly staff
  • +Dedicated and supportive professors
  • +Practical and relevant course content
  • +Excellent professors and dedicated faculty
  • +Strong academic programs and learning opportunities
  • +Fostering autonomy and lifelong learning

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated teaching materials and unengaged faculty are prevalent.
  • -Poor academic integrity and unfair treatment of students are concerns.
  • -Significant organizational and administrative shortcomings are evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Unclear communication and bureaucratic hurdles frustrate students.
  • -Facilities are perceived as outdated and lacking essential resources.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often seen as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves strong marks in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a solid 4.0. Facilities and value are also well-regarded, earning 3.8. Student life garners a respectable 3.6. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area with a 2.8 rating, and professor ratings are moderate at 3.0.

Nothing to show

A university's profile shows a clear strength in its **location**, earning a high rating of 4.6. Conversely, **internationality** stands out as the weakest area, rated at 3.0. Ratings for facilities, professors, and student life are consistent at 3.6, with accommodation and value falling slightly lower at 3.2 and 3.4 respectively.

This institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its high rating for **Internationality**, earning a perfect score. Overall, facilities, professors, location, student life, and value are all highly regarded. The weakest area, though still respectable, is accommodation, which received a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good programs, adequate facilities, and enjoyable city life. Negative feedback (~19%) points to issues with teacher engagement and organization. The average rating is 3.25/5.

Nothing to show

Most reviews are positive, praising the friendly environment, dedicated teachers, and helpful staff. A few mention high costs and additional fees as drawbacks.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise excellent professors and a commitment to maximizing learning opportunities and fostering autonomy.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
6%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
31%
0%
60%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
44%
0%
40%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
19%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
good studying life

The university provides undergraduate, graduate and doctoral studies in various fields, such as health sciences, social sciences and law, engineering and architecture, arts and humanities. The university has all the necessary equipment. Sometimes there are different events that make student life brighter.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close