Agricultural University of Georgia vs Tbilisi State Medical University - TSSU vs Caucasus University - CIU vs Georgian Technical University - GTU vs Georgian National University SEU - SEU

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Agricultural University of Georgia (5.00)
Agricultural University of Georgia: wins 1/3 categories
Tbilisi State Medical University - TSSU: wins 0/3 categories
Caucasus University - CIU: wins 0/3 categories
Georgian Technical University - GTU: wins 0/3 categories
Georgian National University SEU - SEU: wins 2/3 categories
Alte University: wins 0/3 categories
International Black Sea University: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Medicine
Tbilisi, Georgia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
3.33
3.71
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.06
2.71
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
3.83
3.57
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
3.76
2.86
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
3.67
3.43
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
3.50
2.67
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and engaging campus facilities
  • +Excellent study laboratories and technology
  • +Supportive faculty
  • +Expert and supportive faculty
  • +Affordable tuition and quality education
  • +Balanced academic and holistic development
  • +Comprehensive business programs
  • +Experienced, professional tutors
  • +Modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent infrastructure and modern facilities.
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty.
  • +Welcoming environment for international students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Lack of practical work and real-life experience.
  • -Financial focus over educational quality
  • -Poor instructor qualifications
  • -Lack of student well-being consideration

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear course structure and poor instruction quality are frustrating.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional marks across several key aspects, including facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value, all receiving a perfect score. Its primary area for potential improvement lies in its internationality, which received a lower rating compared to other categories. Location also scored well, though not at the highest tier.

This institution excels in its location, receiving the highest rating. Student life and internationality also score well. However, the facilities are its weakest point, with the lowest rating among all categories. Accommodations and overall value represent solid mid-range scores, with professors also receiving a favorable review.

Assessments reveal a university with notable strengths in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation** emerged as the lowest-rated aspect, with **location** and **student life** also scoring below average. Other areas, including professors, internationality, and value, received moderate to good reviews, suggesting a mixed but generally solid experience, with notable room for improvement in practical student support and campus environment.

Nothing to show

Remarkably, this institution scores perfectly in several key areas, including facilities, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Professors also receive a very high rating of 4.5. The only area not reaching a perfect score is professors, though still representing a strong performance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The sole review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. This feedback highlights a welcoming atmosphere, a great campus with excellent facilities and tech, and strong faculty support.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 18 reviews, ~78% are positive, praising expert faculty, supportive community, and effective learning structures. A small portion of feedback (~5.6%) expresses concerns about practical experience and knowledge acquisition.

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong business programs and experienced lecturers. ~14% of feedback is negative, primarily concerning financial focus and instructor qualifications. The average rating is 3.43/5.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the modern infrastructure, fair grading, and supportive teachers. The university is highlighted as a great choice for international students, particularly for medicine studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
33%
14%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
0%
44%
43%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
17%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
6%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

TSMU is a place with an abundance of knowledge!

It is a very friendly place and makes learning very effortless. The teachers are very helpful too Our practical classes have been conducive and they provide extra lessons to build our confidence. Lots of cultural events also take place to balance our hectic schedules.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close