Maltepe University vs Universidad Marítima del Caribe - UMC vs University of Calgary vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs United University
Side-by-side comparison from 121 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Specialized maritime engineering program
- +Supportive learning environment and engaging faculty
- +Strong research opportunities and resources
- +Flexibility and accessibility for students
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Strong academic programs and quality instruction
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of administrative support and unclear management communication cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching methods and curriculum delivery are prevalent concerns.
- -Underfunding of programs and limited course availability.
- -Poor teaching quality and administrative issues in academic departments.
- -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns and negative responses to activism.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative and management issues.
- -Concerns are raised about the relevance and quality of teaching and curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution presents a uniformly neutral profile across all evaluated aspects. Areas of strength and weakness are not discernible, as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received identical scores. The assessment indicates no particular standout features or significant shortcomings.
Exhibiting a strong international profile, this university received its highest rating for Internationality at 4.34. Location also scored highly at 4.27, closely followed by Facilities at 4.24. Conversely, Student Life, with a rating of 3.98, and Accomodation, at 3.93, represent the areas with comparatively lower scores among the surveyed aspects.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Overall, this institution garners strong approval, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Accomodation** also achieves a top rating. Its **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The **Location** is the sole area with a slightly lower score of 3, indicating it's the weakest point in this assessment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university receives a 4/5 average rating, with ~100% of feedback being positive. The positive sentiment highlights a selective range of careers, specifically mentioning Maritime Engineering as a strong program.
~96% of 109 reviews are positive, praising the supportive learning environment, faculty, and growth opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~4%) highlights concerns with course availability and program funding.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, the single review highlights exceptional academic experiences and an esteemed reputation. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Months before I was due to graduate, I faced harassment from two Physics and Astronomy department heads due to having a disability. I submitted a harassment complaint and instead of resolving the situation, the dean of the science faculty, the vice provost student experience and vice provost EDI retaliated and I had to deal with assault from an associate dean. The math courses, physics courses and computer science courses I took were universally poorly taught, and poorly administered. There is no support for students with disabilities and those who are othered are treated harshly and unfairly.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
