Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Center for Higher Studies in Legal and Criminological Sciences - CESCIJUC

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH (4.70)
Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/6 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Center for Higher Studies in Legal and Criminological Sciences - CESCIJUC: wins 4/6 categories
UMOV Academy - Umov academy: wins 0/6 categories
National Technological Institute of Mexico - TecNM: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: History
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Pedagogical Education
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
4.50
Win
4.40
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.50
4.50
4.70
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.41
4.60
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
4.59
4.60
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.50
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.63
3.90
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
5.00
4.63
3.90
Not rated
5.00
3.50
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.66
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Unique specializations in social sciences and history
  • +Academic excellence and quality professors
  • +Career-focused and demanding programs
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse courses and flexible schedules
  • +Affordable fees and degree options
  • +Expert professors with strong credentials
  • +Flexible and accessible learning
  • +Practical, up-to-date content
  • +Supportive teaching and student services

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive workload and demanding assignments are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues cause frustration and confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Instruction quality and course content are often found lacking.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional praise for its value, receiving a perfect score. Professors and location are also significant strengths, both rated highly at 4.5. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which both received a rating of 3.5.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these domains. Conversely, the university's accommodation received a score of zero, suggesting this is a significant area for improvement and a notable weakness.

This institution excels in several key areas, with particularly high marks for its Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, all receiving a 4 out of 5. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as a significant weakness, scoring a low 1. The Location and Internationality also received moderate ratings of 2 and 2.5 respectively, while Value for money is rated at a respectable 3.5.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, the university is highly regarded. Positive feedback highlights excellent professors, academic excellence, and unique specializations like Ethnohistory. There is no negative feedback.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. The student praised its academic offerings, diverse course options, and affordable fees, while noting some administrative shortcomings.

With a high average rating of 4.5/5, these university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the flexible, accessible platform and well-structured, practical content. Support and pacing are also frequently highlighted as strengths.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
67%
67%
60%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
33%
39%
40%
0%
100%
50%
0%
3★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close