Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Colegio Iberoamericano Barnard - CIB vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Unique specializations in social sciences and history
- +Academic excellence and quality professors
- +Career-focused and demanding programs
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Excellent teachers and well-maintained facilities
- +Flexible scheduling and convenient location options
- +User-friendly platform and diverse payment choices
- +Diverse courses and flexible schedules
- +Affordable fees and degree options
- +Expert professors with strong credentials
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Inefficient administrative and management practices cause frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.
- -Excessive workload and demanding assignments are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues cause frustration and confusion.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its value, receiving a perfect score. Professors and location are also significant strengths, both rated highly at 4.5. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which both received a rating of 3.5.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
This university's facilities stand out with an excellent rating of 4.5. Professors and student life also received solid scores of 4. Areas like location and accommodation are rated favorably at 4. The university's internationality and value propositions are its weakest points, both scoring 3.5.
This institution boasts exceptional strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these domains. Conversely, the university's accommodation received a score of zero, suggesting this is a significant area for improvement and a notable weakness.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, the university is highly regarded. Positive feedback highlights excellent professors, academic excellence, and unique specializations like Ethnohistory. There is no negative feedback.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, functional facilities, and an interactive platform. Convenient payment options and flexible schedules are also highlighted.
With a single review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. The student praised its academic offerings, diverse course options, and affordable fees, while noting some administrative shortcomings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
