Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Tecnológico Nacional de México vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Unique specializations in social sciences and history
- +Academic excellence and quality professors
- +Career-focused and demanding programs
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
- +Relevant and comprehensive curriculum with modern technology
- +Dedicated and supportive faculty
- +Rich academic and cultural activities
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Excellent teachers and strong student support
- +Well-maintained facilities and accessible cafeteria
- +Attractive schedules and student wellness programs
- +Excellent teachers and well-maintained facilities
- +Flexible scheduling and convenient location options
- +User-friendly platform and diverse payment choices
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
- -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a major concern.
- -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical experience and outdated curriculum are major concerns.
- -Students are dissatisfied with administrative and management issues.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and insufficient.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Inefficient administrative and management practices cause frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its value, receiving a perfect score. Professors and location are also significant strengths, both rated highly at 4.5. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which both received a rating of 3.5.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, Professors, Accommodations, and Value are also highly rated, each earning a solid 4. While no areas fall below a strong standing, these latter categories represent the relative weakest points in its otherwise outstanding profile.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
This institution excels across numerous aspects, earning perfect scores in Location, Professors, Student Life, and Value. Facilities and Accomodation are also highly regarded with 4.5 ratings, reflecting excellent support for students. Internationality also scores strongly at 4.5. While no areas are rated poorly, the slightly lower, though still very positive, scores for facilities and accommodation suggest these might be areas with the most room for minor improvement compared to other exceptional aspects.
This university's facilities stand out with an excellent rating of 4.5. Professors and student life also received solid scores of 4. Areas like location and accommodation are rated favorably at 4. The university's internationality and value propositions are its weakest points, both scoring 3.5.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, the university is highly regarded. Positive feedback highlights excellent professors, academic excellence, and unique specializations like Ethnohistory. There is no negative feedback.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
These reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback rating the university 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent technology, a relevant curriculum, dedicated teachers, and strong engineering programs as key strengths.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
With two positive reviews and an average rating of 5/5, student feedback highlights good teachers and clean facilities. Students also appreciate the attractive schedules and affordable cafeteria options.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, functional facilities, and an interactive platform. Convenient payment options and flexible schedules are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show