London School of Commerce - LSC vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs NEXT Academy vs Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - UTM vs Kolej Poly-Tech MARA - KUPTM
Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic reputation and exceptional faculty
- +Excellent campus facilities and environment
- +Industry collaborations and career opportunities
- +Supportive and expert faculty with strong industry relevance
- +Modern facilities and conducive learning environment
- +Valuable internships and vibrant student experience
- +Career-ready, practical, and industry-focused programmes
- +Supportive lecturers and valuable real-world project experience
- +Rewarding holistic student experience
- +Supportive supervisors and academic environment
- +Ample research opportunities and facilities
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Excessive and inflexible penalties are a significant concern.
- -Unhelpful and rude staff exacerbate problems.
- -Lack of timely and effective communication.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Poor faculty engagement and support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and transparency creates uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
This university garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its **location** (4.375) and **value** (4.333). **Facilities** and **professors** also receive commendable scores around 4.1. Areas for potential improvement include **student life**, which received the lowest rating at 3.875, though **accommodation** and **internationality** both score a solid 4.
This institution garners its highest marks in Location, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and Student Life also score very well, indicating satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality present the weakest points, with ratings suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Value fall in the middle, reflecting a generally positive but not outstanding performance.
This institution garners exceptional scores across the board, achieving a perfect 5 out of 5 in every surveyed category. This suggests outstanding performance in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no discernible weak areas, the university presents a consistently strong offering to its students.
This university excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and location. Student life and internationality are also strong, with ratings of 4. While facilities and value are well-regarded at 4, the accommodation rating stands out as a significant weakness at 0.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
Approximately 89% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, research, and supportive faculty. A small percentage (around 11%) of negative feedback criticizes slow administrative processes and unhelpful management.
The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting smooth enrollment, well-equipped facilities, and valuable internships. Students praise expert teachers and a vibrant campus life. No negative feedback was reported.
This university garners highly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise practical, industry-focused courses, supportive lecturers, and valuable real-world project experiences that enhance career readiness.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This indicates overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of comments highlighting strong research opportunities and a supportive academic environment. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
In my opinion, UTM is one of the leading universities in Malaysia, especially for engineering and technology-related fields. What I like most is its strong academic reputation, research opportunities, and diverse international community. The university also maintains collaborations with industries, which can benefit students in terms of internships and future careers. One aspect that some students may find challenging is that administrative processes can occasionally be slow, and adapting to a large campus may take time for new students. However, these are relatively minor issues compared to the overall quality of education. Overall, I would recommend UTM to students who are looking for a reputable university with strong academic programs, research exposure, and an international learning environment. If you are applying to UTM yourself, I can also help you write more personalized answers based on your academic background.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
