London School of Commerce - LSC vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs NEXT Academy vs University of Malaya - UM vs Kolej Poly-Tech MARA - KUPTM

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/7 categories
NEXT Academy: wins 0/7 categories
University of Malaya - UM: wins 0/7 categories
Kolej Poly-Tech MARA - KUPTM: wins 0/7 categories
Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology: wins 7/7 categories
UniKL Business School - UBIS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4.20
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3.70
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.56
Not rated
3.90
3.67
5.00
Win
2.00
Location
4.75
4.78
Not rated
4.80
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
3.25
4.67
Not rated
4.20
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
3.50
4.67
Not rated
3.80
3.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Student life
3.75
4.00
Not rated
4.50
4.17
5.00
Win
2.00
Value
2.75
4.00
Not rated
4.20
3.83
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
2.00
3.22
Not rated
3.60
3.33
5.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Prestigious global and local reputation
  • +High-quality, practical learning experiences
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse activities
  • +Supportive and expert faculty with strong industry relevance
  • +Modern facilities and conducive learning environment
  • +Valuable internships and vibrant student experience
  • +Career-ready, practical, and industry-focused programmes
  • +Supportive lecturers and valuable real-world project experience
  • +Rewarding holistic student experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment cause significant frustration.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of timely and effective communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Poor faculty engagement and support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency creates uncertainty.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Nothing to show

A standout performer, the university excels particularly in its **Location** (4.8) and **Student Life** (4.5). **Professors** (4.2) and **Value** (4.2) also receive strong marks. The primary area for improvement lies with **Accomodation** (3.6), which is the lowest-rated category. **Facilities** (3.9) and **Internationality** (3.8) fall within a moderate range.

This institution garners its highest marks in Location, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and Student Life also score very well, indicating satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality present the weakest points, with ratings suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Value fall in the middle, reflecting a generally positive but not outstanding performance.

This institution garners exceptional scores across the board, achieving a perfect 5 out of 5 in every surveyed category. This suggests outstanding performance in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no discernible weak areas, the university presents a consistently strong offering to its students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% highlight the university's prestige, strong global and employer reputation, and diverse multicultural environment. There is minimal negative feedback.

The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting smooth enrollment, well-equipped facilities, and valuable internships. Students praise expert teachers and a vibrant campus life. No negative feedback was reported.

This university garners highly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise practical, industry-focused courses, supportive lecturers, and valuable real-world project experiences that enhance career readiness.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
67%
0%
40%
0%
100%
0%
4★
25%
33%
0%
40%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
20%
33%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close