New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University College of Beder vs University of arts Tirana - UART

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of arts Tirana - UART (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/7 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/7 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/7 categories
University College of Beder: wins 1/7 categories
University of arts Tirana - UART: wins 5/7 categories
Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel: wins 0/7 categories
Polis University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Best programme: Sculpture
Best programme: Dentistry
Tirana, Albania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.67
3.67
4.33
Win
4.00
3.33
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.67
4.33
4.67
5.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.67
4.67
4.67
5.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.33
4.67
Win
4.33
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.67
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.67
4.67
4.67
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.33
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Strong academic support and accessible professors
  • +Excellent library resources
  • +Great location and facilities
  • +Supportive teachers and new opportunities
  • +Innovative programs and international experiences
  • +Experienced professors and practical, job-ready training
  • +Professors' willingness to teach and hands-on clinic experience
  • +Preparation for the job market post-graduation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative issues and poor communication from staff are consistently disliked.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear expectations and communication lead to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university garners impressive scores, with professors, location, student life, and value standing out as exceptionally strong areas, all receiving a perfect 4.67. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4.33, alongside internationality. While no category falls below a strong rating, facilities and accommodation represent the relatively weakest aspects compared to the university's other highly praised attributes.

Overall, this institution garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are also strong points, rated highly at four out of five. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with its weakest area still being a positive score.

This institution excels in internationality and value, both receiving top marks. Facilities, location, and accommodation are rated moderately well. However, student life presents a significant area for improvement, indicated by its lowest score. Professor quality is also a strong point, but not as exceptional as internationalization and value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise strong teaching, helpful professors, and excellent library resources. They also highlight good programs and convenient locations.

The sole review is highly positive, rating the university a perfect 5/5. The reviewer highlights excellent opportunities for artistic expression, supportive and approachable teachers, and recent innovations like Erasmus programs.

Students highlight well-prepared professors and effective programs that prepare them for the job market. With a high average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, the sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
0%
67%
100%
33%
0%
4★
100%
0%
100%
33%
0%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close