University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine - USAMV vs Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc vs Midlands State University vs University of Rzeszów - UR vs Supershine University

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Texila American University (5.00)
University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine - USAMV: wins 0/5 categories
Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc: wins 1/5 categories
Midlands State University: wins 1/5 categories
University of Rzeszów - UR: wins 1/5 categories
Supershine University: wins 0/5 categories
Texila American University: wins 2/5 categories
Dovecot College of Nursing: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Peace and Conflict Studies
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
East Bank Demerara, Guyana
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Category ratings
Facilities
2.45
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.45
Not rated
4.38
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.75
5.00
4.29
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
2.70
5.00
3.82
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Student life
3.30
4.00
4.31
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.95
5.00
Win
4.47
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
2.70
3.00
4.20
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Fosters growth and independence through challenging, self-reliant learning.
  • +Top-tier lecturers and strong academic programmes
  • +Diverse student body and international exposure
  • +Opportunities for growth and career preparation
  • +Quality teaching and approachable professors
  • +Strong focus on practical skills and internships
  • +Modern facilities and positive campus atmosphere

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
  • +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of communication and unresponsiveness from staff are major complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent policies are often cited.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors and internationality, alongside a top rating for value. Student life and accommodation are also strengths, both receiving a solid four. Conversely, the university's location received a zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Facilities also received a moderate rating of three.

This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its **Value** and **Location** standing out as particularly high-rated areas. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Professors** also received very positive scores, indicating a well-rounded experience. The **Facilities** are rated well, though slightly lower than these top-performing categories. The **Internationality** score represents the weakest area in this assessment.

Excelling in several key aspects, this institution boasts perfect scores for its facilities and internationality. Student life and location also receive high marks, alongside a commendable value proposition. Accommodation is rated well, indicating a solid living experience. The professors' rating, while still good, is the weakest area within this otherwise strong overall evaluation.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

The university receives positive feedback, with one review rating it 4 out of 5 stars. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback, highlighting a good learning environment that fosters independence and hard work.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.65 average rating. ~94% of feedback highlights top-tier lecturers, a nurturing learning culture, and diverse student experiences. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes challenges with accommodation security and booking policies.

With an average rating of 4/5, university student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong teaching quality, approachable professors, and a focus on practical skills with modern facilities.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
71%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
100%
24%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
100%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close