Universidad Anáhuac vs Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/7 categories
Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 1/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Batangas State University - BSU: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Vizcaya de las Américas - UVA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Automotive Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.75
Not rated
Location
4.50
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
Professors
4.41
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.59
Win
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
3.00
3.75
Not rated
Student life
4.63
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.63
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.66
Win
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
4.00
3.25
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +High-quality education and professional, knowledgeable professors.
  • +Excellent facilities and learning equipment.
  • +Internship opportunities and career exploration.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently cited.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance across several key areas, with an exceptional rating for **Value**, scoring a perfect 5. **Professors** and **Student Life** also received high marks at 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.25, while **Location** is also noted as a lower-scoring aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.5/5, student reviews highlight excellent educational quality, professional and knowledgeable professors, and world-class learning equipment. Opportunities for professional development and flexible learning modes are also praised.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
67%
0%
33%
0%
50%
50%
0%
4★
39%
0%
58%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close