Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO
Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
- +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
- +Relevant programs leading to career success
- +Contribution to economic growth
- +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
- +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
- +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
Nothing to show
- +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
- +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
- +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.
- +quality faculty and student programs
- +good location
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
- -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
- -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
- -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
- -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.
Nothing to show
This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.
This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.
This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.
Nothing to show
An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.
Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.
With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.
With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.
With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show