LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Universitas Pertamina vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I
Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
- +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
- +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
Nothing to show
- +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Real-world application and industry relevance
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.
Nothing to show
All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
Nothing to show
Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show