LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Universitas Pertamina vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 4/5 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/5 categories
Tanri Abeng University - TAU: wins 0/5 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 1/5 categories
Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I: wins 0/5 categories
STIE Indonesia Jakarta: wins 0/5 categories
University of Bunda Mulia - UBM: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications

Nothing to show

  • +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Real-world application and industry relevance

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

Nothing to show

Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
4★
50%
0%
0%
67%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close