Universidade de São Paulo - USP vs Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP vs Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU vs Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado - FAAP vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality academics and expert professors
- +Valuable networking opportunities with diverse peers
- +Excellent campus facilities and student support
- +Renowned academic quality and top-tier professors
- +Excellent infrastructure and practical learning experiences
- +Welcoming environment for international students
- +High quality faculty and excellent teaching
- +Convenient location and safety
- +Scholarship and alumni discount programs
Nothing to show
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
- -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Ineffective teaching and unengaging course content.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of practical learning opportunities and rescheduled experiences.
- -Insufficient or outdated facilities impacting the educational experience.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates notable strengths in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving top marks. Location also scores well. However, the accommodation facilities represent the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities and professor quality are rated solidly in the mid-range.
This institution garners exceptional acclaim for its professors, student life, and perceived value, all receiving a near-perfect score. Facilities and location also scored highly, indicating a well-rounded and desirable environment. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still received a solid rating. Internationality is also a strong point, reflecting a diverse campus.
This institution garners solid scores in several key aspects. Its location is a standout strength, while facilities and professors also receive favorable ratings. Student life and value for money are areas with room for improvement. Accommodation and internationality are the weakest points, suggesting opportunities for enhancement in these domains.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
93% of reviews are positive, highlighting beneficial networking, great personal and professional opportunities, and amazing professors. A small amount of feedback noted some campi's infrastructure doesn't match others.
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise excellent infrastructure, top-tier professors, and the university's strong academic reputation and practical learning opportunities.
University feedback is mixed, with a ~25% of reviews expressing dissatisfaction. Positive feedback highlights respected faculty and good facilities, while negative comments focus on a lack of rescheduled lab classes and field trips.
Nothing to show
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
I truly love the University of São Paulo. It’s not only the best university in Latin America, but also one of the most respected institutions in the world. What makes USP so special to me is its massive research infrastructure. The academic environment encourages curiosity, and for students who stand out, there are countless opportunities — whether in research, internships, or academic exchange. What I admire most is how knowledge is taken seriously here. Professors are highly qualified, and you’re constantly surrounded by brilliant minds. It’s a challenging space, but it pushes you to grow. However, if there’s something I think could be improved, it’s the way the institute’s funding is managed. In many cases, the needs of undergraduate students are not the top priority. It often feels like the investment is directed elsewhere, rather than towards improving the daily life and academic support for those who are just starting their journey in higher education. Still, despite its flaws, I would definitely recommend USP. It’s a place that shapes people — not only academically, but personally. If you’re willing to engage and take advantage of everything it offers, USP will open doors you never imagined.
The university is wonderful and has a wonderful infrastructure, but policies for access to education and dissemination of scientific knowledge are still lacking for non-university people. The university still functions as a "bubble".
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
