Universidad El Bosque vs Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN

Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC (4.90)
Universidad El Bosque: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 4/7 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN: wins 1/7 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 1/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.83
4.07
4.60
4.50
3.00
4.88
Win
Not rated
Location
4.71
4.92
Win
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.57
4.86
Win
4.67
4.25
4.00
4.63
Not rated
Internationality
3.43
4.21
4.67
Win
3.00
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.85
Win
4.20
4.00
3.00
4.38
Not rated
Value
4.14
4.79
Win
4.17
4.25
4.00
4.75
Not rated
Accommodation
3.67
3.85
4.00
4.25
5.00
Win
4.29
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong medical and nursing programs with practical experience opportunities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment with friendly teachers and peers
  • +Excellent personal and professional development opportunities, including exchanges
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Supportive learning environment and quality programs
  • +Welcoming and student-friendly atmosphere
  • +Financial accessibility and athletic opportunities
  • +Excellent teaching quality and teacher attentiveness
  • +High-quality education provided by the institution
  • +Excellent instructors and well-equipped facilities enhance learning.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness is highly valued.
  • +Innovative programs and support for students entering the workforce are appreciated.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently a source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are consistently criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. It excels particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving an outstanding rating. **Professors** and **Location** also scored highly. However, areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities** (4.5) and strong scores for **Professors** (4.25) and **Value** (4.25), suggesting a positive learning environment and good return on investment. **Accommodation** also receives a high rating (4.25). The weakest area, **Internationality**, with a score of 3, indicates room for improvement in global engagement. **Location** and **Student Life** are rated well at 4.

Offering a truly standout experience, this university excels in its **Accomodation**, achieving a perfect score. Its **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are also strong points, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are rated competently at 3, indicating areas for potential development alongside its already impressive strengths.

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, scoring an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.625, alongside a strong **Value** rating of 4.75. The **Location** and **Student Life** also fare well. However, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting strong medical programs, excellent personal/professional development opportunities, and positive learning environments with good facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are highly positive, highlighting supportive staff and a great learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

The single review expresses strong satisfaction, particularly praising the excellent teaching approach and thoroughness of instructors. This positive feedback represents 100% of the feedback, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

All 8 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students frequently praise excellent facilities, capable instructors, and strong preparation for the workforce. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
81%
86%
33%
0%
50%
0%
4★
25%
13%
14%
33%
100%
50%
0%
3★
13%
6%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close