London School of Commerce - LSC vs CICRA Campus Cyber Security Education vs University of Sri Jayewardenepura vs Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology vs Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka - SUSL

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: CICRA Campus Cyber Security Education (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
CICRA Campus Cyber Security Education: wins 4/7 categories
University of Sri Jayewardenepura: wins 1/7 categories
Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology: wins 1/7 categories
Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka - SUSL: wins 0/7 categories
Imperial College of Business Studies: wins 0/7 categories
Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation - APIIT: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Cyber Security and Digital Forensics
Best programme: Business Studies and Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
2.00
4.00
4.71
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
Location
4.75
5.00
Win
4.33
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
2.67
Professors
3.25
5.00
Win
4.33
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.75
Internationality
3.50
3.00
3.83
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
Win
Student life
3.75
5.00
Win
4.33
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
Value
2.75
5.00
Win
4.33
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
3.83
Win
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Excellent education quality and competitive programs
  • +Pathway opportunities to Australian and UK universities
  • +Strong specialization in cybersecurity
  • +High quality management and commerce programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Valuable practical skills and efficient course delivery
  • +Practical courses and knowledgeable, helpful lecturers
  • +Good campus facilities and opportunities for growth
  • +Strong academic reputation and graduate placements

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academics with practical, industry-relevant skills.
  • +Diverse, international environment fostering cultural understanding.
  • +Responsive and helpful professors.
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are often criticized.
  • -Some students express dissatisfaction with course content and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support staff create a challenging environment.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Unengaging teaching methods and curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with professors, location, student life, and overall value receiving perfect scores. Internationality also fares well, though it falls short of top marks. Conversely, accommodation is rated exceptionally low. Facilities, while not the weakest, received a significantly lower score than most other aspects.

Academic and student experience aspects of this university are highly rated. Professors, location, student life, and perceived value all achieve strong scores around 4.33. Facilities also perform well with a rating of 4. The university's accommodation and internationality are its comparatively weaker areas, both scoring 3.83. Overall, the institution demonstrates a positive student experience and academic offering.

Outstanding performance is evident in the university's facilities, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and value also received very strong marks. Student life and location are rated favorably, with internationality also proving to be a positive aspect. However, accommodation presents a notable area for improvement, with a significantly lower rating compared to other metrics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Value**, earning high scores in both areas. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also receive positive marks. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant weakness, with the lowest rating. **Location** also indicates room for improvement, falling below the average for other metrics.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single review praises the quiet campus, good lecturers, competitive content, and international degree pathways, recommending it for cybersecurity studies.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~67% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the university's high-quality education and the excellent Management and Commerce faculty. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 8 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical courses, helpful lecturers, and good internship opportunities. Minor administrative slowness was noted once.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong program foundations, a balance of theory and practical experience, and a diverse international environment. Some note areas for improvement like increased industry exposure and occasional professor responsiveness issues.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
50%
63%
0%
0%
25%
4★
25%
0%
17%
13%
0%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
33%
25%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close