emlyon business school vs Pandit Deendayal Energy University vs Veer Narmad South Gujarat University vs Saurashtra University vs Marwadi University - Marawadi

Side-by-side comparison from 61 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: P P Savani University - PPSU (5.00)
emlyon business school: wins 0/2 categories
Pandit Deendayal Energy University: wins 0/2 categories
Veer Narmad South Gujarat University: wins 0/2 categories
Saurashtra University: wins 2/2 categories
Marwadi University - Marawadi: wins 0/2 categories
P P Savani University - PPSU: wins 0/2 categories
Dharmsinh Desai University: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Banking and International Finance
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.00
Not rated
5.00
4.29
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.66
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.57
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.12
3.00
Not rated
5.00
4.43
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
3.00
Not rated
5.00
4.14
5.00
Not rated
Student life
4.30
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.29
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.49
4.00
Not rated
5.00
4.29
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Focus on knowledge and experience building
  • +Emphasis on personality development
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical and research-focused learning
  • +Diverse and international student community
  • +Dedicated faculty and personalized academic support
  • +Conducive learning environment and holistic development focus
  • +Beautiful campus and balanced approach to academics and activities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and delivery methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly cited.
  • -Teaching quality and course content often fail to meet student expectations.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Across all assessed metrics, the university demonstrates outstanding performance. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a perfect score of 5 out of 5. This indicates a consistently high standard of quality and satisfaction across every aspect of the student experience. There are no weakest areas to highlight, as every category is exceptionally strong.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors are rated exceptionally well, and the university also scores highly for its facilities, student life, and value. Accommodation and internationality are also positive aspects. However, the location received a comparatively lower rating.

This institution shines in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality. Student life also scores well, indicating a vibrant campus experience. However, its location receives a moderate rating, suggesting this may be a less advantageous aspect compared to other surveyed elements. Overall, the value proposition is rated highly.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight building new knowledge and experiences, along with personal development.

All seven reviews are positive, averaging 4.29 out of 5 stars. Students highlight supportive teachers, practical learning, and a lively, clean campus with opportunities for networking and research.

This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight exceptional academics and faculty support, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
0%
0%
0%
29%
100%
0%
4★
27%
0%
0%
100%
71%
0%
0%
3★
10%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close