University of Sanata Dharma vs STIKes Madani vs Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir vs Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY vs Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU

Side-by-side comparison from 4 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Sanata Dharma: wins 0/0 categories
STIKes Madani: wins 0/0 categories
Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir: wins 0/0 categories
Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY: wins 0/0 categories
Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU: wins 0/0 categories
University of Amikom Yogyakarta - AMIKOM: wins 0/0 categories
SMKN 6 Yogyakarta: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Midwifery
Best programme: Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Information and Communication Systems Engineering
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Student life
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Islamic integration with healthcare courses
  • +Quranic memorization and Arabic language requirements
  • +Strong academic programs in nuclear technology
  • +Student-friendly environment in Yogyakarta
  • +Excellent laboratory facilities
  • +Practical curriculum and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Collaborative environment and modern facilities
  • +Valuable career services support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on practical learning
  • +Supportive and helpful teachers
  • +Good facilities and resources
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a consistent concern.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is frustrating for students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of necessary resources and support is a significant drawback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution receives excellent marks for its professors and overall value, both earning a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also strong, each rated at a solid four. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating, coming in at a three. This indicates a generally positive experience with notable strengths in teaching quality and affordability.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution shines particularly brightly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. Student life and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive campus environment. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which received moderate scores. The overall value proposition appears strong.

Exceptional marks were awarded across all evaluated aspects. The university achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a uniformly outstanding experience with no specific areas requiring improvement or standing out as significantly stronger than others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. Positive feedback (100%) highlights programs that integrate Islamic learning with academic courses like midwifery, nursing, and pharmacy, including mandatory Quran memorization and Arabic language.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university garners high praise for its student-friendly environment and strong academic programs. Positive comments highlight excellent laboratory facilities and specialized nuclear-related education.

With a single review, the student experience is rated a perfect 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. This suggests a highly satisfactory educational environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close