National University - NU vs Technological University of the Philippines - TUP vs FEU Institute of Technology - FEU vs STI Colleges vs EARIST Manila - EARIST Manila

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
National University - NU: wins 0/3 categories
Technological University of the Philippines - TUP: wins 0/3 categories
FEU Institute of Technology - FEU: wins 0/3 categories
STI Colleges: wins 0/3 categories
EARIST Manila - EARIST Manila: wins 0/3 categories
Lyceum of the Philippines University Manila - LPU: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Manila, Philippines
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Computer Networking and Engineering Technology
Best programme: Information Technology
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Office Management
Best programme: Bsc Hospitality and Tourism Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
3.67
5.00
4.20
3.00
5.00
Location
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.60
4.00
5.00
Win
Professors
3.67
4.33
3.00
4.80
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.67
3.33
3.00
4.60
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
4.67
4.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
Value
4.33
4.67
4.00
4.60
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
2.67
3.67
3.00
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and supportive professors
  • +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
  • +Academic and extracurricular support
  • +Quality education and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Free tuition and state university benefits
  • +Personal development and practical skill application
  • +High-quality facilities and competent faculty
  • +Effective education and proper guidance
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +Diverse program offerings
  • +Vibrant academic community
  • +Endless opportunities
  • +Excellent support for personal growth and future career development.
  • +Valued guidance and mentorship from staff and professors.
  • +Opportunities for global success and advancement.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often disappointing.
  • -Administrative & management issues are consistently problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical application and skill development are appreciated the least.
Rating summary
What students say

This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.

This institution garners exceptional praise for its vibrant Student Life and outstanding Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors are also highly rated at 4.33, with Location following closely at 4.00. Areas for potential improvement include Internationality, receiving a rating of 3.33, and Facilities and Accommodation, both scoring 3.67.

The university excels in its **facilities**, receiving a perfect score. Areas like **professors**, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated moderately at a 3, indicating room for improvement. **Student life** and **value** both received positive scores of 4, suggesting these are strong points for prospective students.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

Overall, this institution garners high marks in key academic and experiential areas. Its **professors and value for money stand out as exceptional strengths, both receiving a perfect score of 5**. The location and student life also score well at 4. Areas for improvement, however, include facilities and accommodation, each rated at 3, alongside internationality.

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieved perfect scores in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students, with no discernible weak areas to report.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of student feedback is positive. Reviewers highlight good learning experiences, kind and approachable teachers, and quality education. A few mentions of facility deficiencies were noted.

The single review is positive, giving a 4/5 rating. It highlights high-quality facilities and competent faculty for computer studies and engineering. Negative feedback is absent.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

This university has a 5/5 average rating based on one review. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting a vibrant academic community and diverse program offerings.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students report high satisfaction, highlighting the university's role in personal growth and career development.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
33%
0%
40%
100%
100%
4★
33%
33%
100%
60%
0%
0%
3★
33%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Tuition-Free Quality Education

First off, since it is a state university the tuition is free, and students are not paying anything. However, because it is a public university I sometimes notice deficiencies in its facility. But aside from that, I can't say anything else that is bad about it. Quality education overall.

Nothing to show

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close