Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales - ITN vs IHE Delft Institute for Water Education vs Daytona State College vs Management Development Center International - MDCI vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA

Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mbarara University of Science and Technology (5.00)
Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales - ITN: wins 1/3 categories
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education: wins 0/3 categories
Daytona State College: wins 1/3 categories
Management Development Center International - MDCI: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 0/3 categories
Mbarara University of Science and Technology: wins 1/3 categories
WIT Academy - WIT: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineer
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: MSc in Data Science and Business Analytics
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: 3D Design
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.00
Location
5.00
4.57
4.67
Not rated
4.50
5.00
3.50
Professors
5.00
4.00
4.67
Not rated
4.50
4.50
5.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.86
4.33
Not rated
4.50
4.50
3.00
Student life
4.00
4.43
4.33
Not rated
4.50
4.50
4.50
Value
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.00
4.00
4.33
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teachers and engaging learning opportunities.
  • +Collaborative global environment and networking opportunities
  • +Highly practical, module-based curriculum with theoretical and experimental learning
  • +Quality education and learning experiences
  • +Affordable university-level education
  • +Supportive and accessible professors
  • +Progress towards degree completion

Nothing to show

  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities
  • +Excellent teaching quality and supportive professors
  • +Collaborative and diverse student community
  • +Positive impact on career and personal development
  • +Engaging and supportive teaching staff
  • +High-quality lecturers and tutors
  • +Well-structured and accessible courses
Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burden and poor management.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Education quality does not match the high tuition fees.
  • -Teaching quality is lacking despite professors' experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts student success.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support create a negative student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Limited resources and a lack of essential supplies hinder academic progress.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors, location, internationality, and value. Student life also scores highly, indicating a vibrant campus experience. However, facilities and accommodation received more moderate ratings, suggesting these could be areas for potential improvement.

This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, with its **Internationality** being its most exceptional attribute. The **Location** also garners high marks, reflecting a desirable setting. Conversely, while still solid, **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** represent areas with slightly less exceptional scores, indicating room for potential enhancement compared to its standout international appeal and prime location.

Excelling across multiple areas, this institution received perfect marks for its value. Facilities, professors, and location also earned exceptionally high scores, all averaging above 4.66. Student life, accommodation, and internationality, while still strong, were the comparatively lower-rated aspects, with scores of 4.33.

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its prime location, accommodating housing options, and overall value, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and international appeal are also highly rated at 4.5. The faculty are also praised with a strong 4.5. Conversely, the facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with an outstanding rating for Professors and a high score for Student Life. Facilities and perceived Value are also commendable. However, the university's weakest areas lie in Accomodation and Internationality, both receiving middling scores. Location also falls on the lower end of the spectrum.

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university has a 4/5 average rating, with all feedback being positive. The single review highlights good teachers and learning opportunities. However, it also notes a recurring theme of dirty bathrooms.

~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting a strong global and multicultural environment, quality education with a practical, modular approach, and collaborative learning. One ~14% negative review cited high costs and concerns about teaching quality.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students highlight positive learning experiences and value for money, with welcoming professors. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight excellent teaching quality, supportive and approachable lecturers, and a collaborative, diverse community. The university is credited with positively shaping careers and lives.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, the feedback is entirely positive. Students praised the engaging teaching and approachable instructors, with no negative comments noted.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
71%
33%
0%
50%
100%
50%
4★
100%
14%
33%
0%
50%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close